Our quality guarantee: Absolutely no Monica
January 27, 1998
New ones Monday through Friday
Hooray for Hollywood
Part 3: The Classics
|
Is it still Henry James time at the movies? Last I checked, the chubby turn of
the century mannerist was still the champ of Proudly Presented cinema, with two prestige
films - Washington Square and Wings of the Dove - playing to
hyperborean, if not capacity, crowds. The movie house may be the last place left where
the modernist revolution still matters, because only those books that
pre-date Ulysses are
considered worthy of enshrinement in the upper reaches of cinema (Merchant and
Ivory did a turgid version of Kazuo Ishiguru's The Remains of the Day a few
years back, but that's fudging things). Can we be far from the
rediscovery of George Gissing, or yet another discovery of Anthony Trollope?
|
|
It's strange, though, that the hoity toity has to strain so visibly to make a
literary movie, when the riffraff has been at it for years. But downmarket Hollywood,
at its best, invokes its literary antecedents with a minimum of the sort of
self-regarding fanfare that gave us the Liverpool Oratorio or any number of Rock
Operas.
Does your appreciation for The Treasure of the Sierra Madre really increase
with the realization that it's based on Chaucer's Pardoner's Tale? Who but your high
school English teacher is going to be impressed by the discovery that the Godfather
films, parts 1 and 2, are a retelling of the dynastic transition narrative in the
Henriad?
These are the sort of antecedents we can enjoy without much mental taxation. Culture
being largely a thing we experience in reverse, it's easier to deal with literature
when we have a proper grounding in literature's proper place - the movies. How hard
is it to appreciate Virgil's Aeneid, a rigorous tale of military wanderings, and the foundation
of a warrior state? We saw the same thing in Stripes.
|
|
|
The possibilities are endless, once you know what to look for. Where can we find
something as
ingenious
as Beowulf's dual mother and son villains? Look no
further than Sean Cunningham's Friday the 13th series. We read Dante and
wonder where we've seen this architecture before - one adventure undeground, another at
the surface and one in the sky. Of course - it's that subway-bus-elevator dynamic from
Speed. The
shaving Ourang-Outan in Poe's Murders in the Rue Morgue is
just a dry run for the vain, depilating Buffalo Bill in Silence of the Lambs
(In both book and movie, Bill is caught through
Dupin-esque ratiocination).
Consider
MacBeth and Lady MacBeth: a childless couple with a shrewish wife and a
husband whose efforts to rise above his station play out in futility against a
backdrop of arcane lodge rituals. We've seen these two before - they're the Kramdens
(There's even a Honeymooners episode in which Ralph is haunted to distraction - Banquo's
Ghost-style - by the image of his fumbling pal Ed Norton).
|
|
|
These artistic connections become more intriguing when the works in question
take on a mental life of their own. Spike Lee made his mark in the movie industry
with She's Gotta Have It, the story of one woman's comical adventures with her
three lovers. But a story that in the mid-1980s seemed delightfully downtown has
an antecedent as old as Edith Wharton. Specifically, Wharton's
story
The Other Two, which details a man's pickle at meeting his
wife's two ex-husbands. Never mind the social and racial distinctions: the point
is that when the same situation crops up in
Westchester and Bed-Stuy, wackiness ensues. Ah Spike, you drawing room litterateur -
you think those Marion the Librarian glasses make you look like Malcolm, but we
know better.
|
|
So what's the point, beyond narrow critical gamesmanship? None (although
it's an opportunity to play up these lovely illustrations from The Other Two).
But the indication is that even the makers of prestige films are catching up with the
downmarket ethos. On the heels of Baz Luhrman's Miami spin on Romeo and Juliet,
and Clueless' update of Jane Austen's Emma, we're getting an updated
version of
Great Expectations in which the main
attraction is Gwyneth Paltrow's delectable
bare back.
These era shifts are clearly intended to draw in an audience attuned to
its own culture, to the exclusion of all others. But I must point out that the great
conceit of shifting the era of a literary work has not been used to its fullest
potential. The model here should be Ian McKellan's version of Richard III, set in a
hypothetical fascist England of the 1930s. How many other possibilities would open
up to filmmakers willing to seize this new freedom? Imagine The Great Gatsby set in
Kruschev's Soviet golden age, with the new money-old money clash replaced by tension
between Party favorites and the new technocracy that put the first man in space.
How about Rocky with Thai boxers?
Or my personal favorite - Julius Caesar set in 1963 America. In a spin on the practice of
having lookalike actors play figures from recent history (Donald Moffat's turn as
Lyndon Johnson in The Right Stuff being a close example), this one would
have B-list stars like William Devane and Lane Smith embody Caesar as Kennedy ("Yet
Caesah shall go fawth"), Cassius as Nixon, etc. The assassination stuff is an
obvious fit, with many possible twists. What could be more provocative than to have
Artemidorus, the citizen who vainly tries to warn Caesar of the plot on his life, be
played by Oswald the Patsy? Who would you rather hear recite "Friends, Romans,
Countrymen" - some Englishman in a toga or Martin Luther King? (Certainly Paul Winfield
could use the work).
Since I have little clout in Tinseltown, I'm not optimistic about selling any of these
pitches. But they're presented here, at no additional cost to you, as a lagniappe on
a day when some big news story is taking up attention spans and bandwidth everywhere
else.
|
|