July 29, 1998
Mary Worth and Nothingness
by Josh Ozersky
![[mary worth on the net]](img/mary-net.gif)
|
Editor's note: As the above cartoon indicates, the legendary Mary Worth has
arrived on the Web.
For an appreciation, we turn to the man who is largely
responsible for the comic's rediscovery as a gem of high Modernism.
As always, we are grateful to Mary Worth creators
John Saunders and Joe Giella, who have always been very helpful in responding to simpleton's inquiries,
and are pleased that our favorite comic is now available in our own Mary-free newspaper market, albeit with an inconvenient two-week delay:
|
|
It is in the marginalia of most defunct newspapers that the Absurdist
spirit strives on best: in Nancy's dotted eyebeams to pies, Leroy Lockhorn's
inexplicable appeal to buxom women in cocktail dresses, in The Wizard of Id's
Christian doggerel, and the deathward musings of grave-racing cartoonist Bil Keane.
Odd then, that few movements in literary history seem less fitted to the swaggering USA
then Absurdism. For one thing, there is the frigid, Olympian detachment and cosmic
despair, products of hardship we have only read about in Time-Life books. Then there
is the ultra-sophisticated sense of humor, the philosophical wit and existential
burlesque which, again, we have only read about in other Time-Life books. Most of
all there are the writers, titans like Samuel Beckett and Eugene Ionesco, whom we
rarely read at all.
The recent success of the Theatre de Complicité's brilliant production of Ionesco's
The Chairs, though, suggests that there may indeed be a market for Absurdism in these
United States! Why not? Who likes a gag more than we do? And it's not as if we have
no precedents, either. There are the Marx Brothers, Apollo 13, Stanley Milgram's
famous experiment, and of
course John Saunders and Joe Giella's
sublime Mary Worth.
Mary Worth? How did that prim spinster get in this boat? Well, readers who think they
can dismiss Mary as indistinguishable from such serial dreck as Brenda Starr or
Apartment 3-G had better think again. Mary Worth is a classic two-panel absurdist
play, in which two or three characters exchange cryptic intelligences to the amazement
of one of them in the iambic second panel. While these discourses appear to make
sense, they in fact impart no information to the reader, who is left to marvel as the
inscrutability of the cosmos. The same conversations often are stretched over weeks,
with each day's concluding panel showing the same amazed or dismayed reaction. Mary
Worth is essentially about the pointlessness of humanity, or what Mad Magazine used to
call, in its satires of Modern Art, "man's inhumanity to man."
|
This April strip kicked off a
lengthy discussion
about whether young Dudley Ford had honorable intentions.
|
Much as the domestic small talk of Ionesco's Old Man and Old Woman or Beckett's Didi
and Gogo seems to be about something, but are really about Nothing, Mary Worth is
about the impossibility of conversation. Consider this exchange, from May 2's
hieroglyph: in panel one, the reclining Toby Cameron, wife of the lush-bearded
Professor Ian Cameron, asks, "You mean Dud Ford isn't a graduate student?"
"He was, Toby," the Professor replies, "He dropped out of the program a month ago."
In panel two, the three face each other under the indifferent palm trees and face
the unknowable meaning of Ian's peroration:
"According to those who know him, young Ford is a renegade, whose abilities far
outweigh his common sense!"
Toby and Mary stare at each other, benumbed by this intelligence. Ian, too, looks
defeated, spent. Laconically, in a space to the left, the authorial imprint appears:
"Saunders and Giella, 5-2" What more comment can be made?
|
|
Further disorienting the reader is the authors' decontextualizing use of stilted
draftsmanship. Everyone looks alike in Mary Worth: the old ladies look like the
young ones, the men can only be told apart by whether they have beards, and even
the body dimensions on the characters suggest a grotesque, illogical creation.
In an America saturated with the deafening roar of the media void, the quiet and
painful, almost Shinto-like stillness of Mary Worth's tragic irony speaks louder
than "common sense" ever can.
|
|