|
You might have thought that every foreigner's nightmare vision of a mindless,
scary
American doofus had been realized in the person of
Mike
Moran,
the firefighting endomorph who commanded Osama bin Laden to "Kiss my royal Irish
ass" during
a fund-raising concert. (This reporter is still not convinced that the subsequent crash
of Flight 587 in Rockaway is unrelated to the
shrill
shoutout
the ungainly public employee gave to his 'hood during his remarks.)
But to see the Ugliest American of them all, a blowhard dumb enough
to be a threat to national security, you must turn to CNN's morning show, where
the ghastly Paula Zahn routinely lectures all foreigners on the righteousness of not only
America's cause, but far more importantly, her own. And she's doing damage to
both causes in the process.
Now, there is certainly no shortage of media personalities right now giving
full vent to our best Citizen Joe-style bravado. And if ever there was an hour for
Americans to claim not merely national pre-eminence but moral, historical and
even aesthetic superiority - claims with which this reporter has no quarrel - that hour
is upon us. But you don't have to be a dummy to do all this; more to the point, you
shouldn't be such a blitherer that when the dust has settled you've actually
given ground to the country's opponents. It is here that Zahn ceases to be merely
a ghoul of vain ambition and actually becomes a public nuisance.
Veteran Zahn watchers know that the War On Terrorism (WOT) is not the first
conflict in which the perky anchorbot has given aid and comfort to the enemy.
Back when she was cutting her teeth with Winter Olympics coverage, Zahn
interfered with the orderly dismantling of the Soviet Union. Recall the moment:
Glasnost was in the air; the
Warsaw Pact was crumbling; from behind the iron curtain the faceless millions
were discovering the wide open luxuries of the West, and their pursuit of Levi's
and Nintendo was rapidly undermining the bankrupt Soviet system. At this crucial moment
for civilization, East German figure skating beauty Katarina Witt was following
her own bliss through a public flirtation with Italian downhill champ Alberto "La Bomba"
Tomba. Even by the most incrementalist, pro-Gorby interpretation of Perestroika,
it's pretty clear that if
Stasi's Ice Princess
had ended up at some Alpine love palace with the pleasure-seeking Italian,
the USSR would have collapsed right then and there. Unfortunately, Zahn, who has
a unique gift for
crossing paths with La Bomba, chose
this moment to insert herself into the mix, and turned what should have been a
quick capitulation into a superpower triangle. The victory of the capitalist West was
deferred, and the Cold War dragged on for years, all for Paula Zahn's pretty face.
An unsupported theory? Perhaps! Unfortunately, Zahn's
war crimes
didn't end with the end of communism. Flash forward to this past October, the day
after the United States began air strikes in Afghanistan and
Osama bin Laden responded by releasing his "Unplugged" video.
To mark the occasion, Zahn brought on two Arabic
media types: Rhagida Dhergam from al Hayat and
the very sharp Hisham Melhem from as Safir. Throughout the
interview, the CNN anchor
pronounced Rhagida as "regatta" - Zahn puts her personal
stamp on the news by mispronouncing names with a frequency that, as
we shall shortly note, can only be intentional.
Declining to take offense, the two Arabs went through all
the proper motions - denouncing all the right
people and supporting the US military
effort (a step which at the time, and even today, very few
Arabs have ventured to do). Since these are both fairly accomplished
Arab journalists whose publications dutifully flog the litany of policy
complaints against the United States, they lend a particular credibility
to the American cause; they arrive at a generally pro-American view not
through sycophancy but through a reasonable assessment of the facts.
But no sooner does Zahn have them on camera than she lobs an insult.
At the close of the interview, she asks Melhem for
a closing summary of what it is that has the
Arabs so hot and bothered against the US. With the usual
laundry list, Melhem mentions "unconditional
support for Israel." Never one to lose the chance to get in a cheap shot,
Zahn takes advantage of the fact that a few days before there has been
a rare (and as it turns out, unique) flare-up between the US and Israel.
The morbidly obese Ariel Sharon had accused the United States of "appeasing"
Yasser Arafat, and White House spokesman Ari Fleischer had in turn
called this comment "unacceptable." So Paula's outro is: "Well, the
White House has publicly disagreed with Prime
Minister Sharon's recent comments, so I don't
know how unconditional it is, but thank you both,
Regatta and Hisham."
First, this is a considerable breach of protocol
toward a guest. She hadn't asked Melhem to attack
or defend the opinion of the "Arab street," merely
to present it, so why does she feel compelled to
respond to him? (I've seen Zahn herself let Bibi
Netanyahu get away with comments that are easily as
absurd as these, and those comments were clearly
presented as personal opinions.) Second, is it
really a major sign of executive independence when
the President of the United States objects to having
an astoundingly portly fellow from a foreign country compare him to
Neville Chamberlain?
Third, who in his or her right mind would
argue that our support for Israel is not
unconditional? Ari Fleischer felt the need to append
"Israel has no better friend than the United States"
to his own comments. Certainly if you went on the
floor of the Senate and asked whether our support
for Israel was unconditional, the Senators would trample each
other in an unseemly rush to give the most enthusiastic
affirmative.
And fourth, who asked you, Paula? Since when did mealy-mouthed
asides from the peanut gallery become a part of the global news gathering
process?
But to get Zahn at her self-regarding, mispronouncing, logic-flubbing
finest, dig this excerpt from her
interview
with Hafez al-Mirazi, the bureau chief for the Qatari news channel al-Jazeera:
ZAHN: Mr. Al-Mirzari, I think we could all agree
this morning we are products of our culture.
HAFEZ AL-MIRAZI, AL-JAZEERA: Al-Mirazi.
ZAHN: But as you know, your station has been accused
of using anti-American language, of
running graphics that feature and glorify Osama bin
Laden. Even Secretary of State Colin
Powell denounced the station when you repeatedly
aired Osama bin Laden's statement and
Colin Powell said that that was vitriolic,
irresponsible kinds of statements. What is your
defense to his criticism?
AL-MIRAZI: Well, Secretary Colin Powell gave
interviews to Al Jazeera and later also said
good words about Al Jazeera, as well as Dr.
Condoleezza Rice and other U.S. officials. They
respected the credibility of Al Jazeera and the
objectivity.
The problem actually is with the American media and
the Western media, who instigated the
government, and they always instigate against an
independent media like Al Jazeera, because
they do what the American media cannot do, which is
not to mix patriotism with journalism.
We cover a war in Afghanistan by putting both sides
of the story, the side coming from Kabul
at that time and...
ZAHN: Well, Mr. Al-Mirzari, I have to stop you
there...
AL-MIRAZI: It's Al-Mirazi.
ZAHN: I think that charge is blatantly ridiculous.
AL-MIRAZI: Well, I'll tell you what is ridiculous...
ZAHN: I think if you watch the majority of the
coverage in this country...
AL-MIRAZI: Paula, what is ridiculous...
ZAHN: We do question the policies of our government.
AL-MIRAZI: Well...
ZAHN: I think we constantly put the leaders of our
government on the spot when we
question...
AL-MIRAZI: Only on domestic policies.
ZAHN: ... the progress of this campaign.
AL-MIRAZI: Only on domestic policies. But in foreign
policy, you are just rubber stamping
whatever the government do.
ZAHN: Oh, Mr. Al-Mirzari, you're not being honest at
all.
AL-MIRAZI: It's Al-Mirazi.
ZAHN: Look at the debate in this country about the
Israeli's retaliatory strikes in...
AL-MIRAZI: OK...
ZAHN: ... in the Middle East. I mean you have read
the editorials in this country.
AL-MIRAZI: Paula, let me...
ZAHN: You've seen the
front page headlines.
AL-MIRAZI: Let me just remind you of the CNN
coverage of what happened Saturday night,
last Saturday. For two hours, CNN was doing exactly
what people were criticizing Al Jazeera
of doing, footage of 10 minutes coming out of
Jerusalem, terrible footage, of course. Nobody
would allow or accept the killing of civilians. But
10 minutes of footage have been kept
repeating all over for more than two hours with
commentators from your own reporters like
Leon and others, and adopting the rhetoric and the
argument of the Likud, not only the Israelis
or the Labor, but the Likud, and giving a podium for
Mr. Netanyahu and all the Israeli right...
ZAHN: I think, sir...
AL-MIRAZI: ... to bash the Arabs.
ZAHN: I have to tell you, I beg to differ with you.
AL-MIRAZI: That is not creative reporting.
ZAHN: I can't say that I watched every minute of our
four hours of coverage that night, but I
will tell you that as with all news organizations,
one would hope that you get on the phone and
you try to find differing points of view. We, of
course, had Palestinian representation on our
air. That is absolutely absurd.
AL-MIRAZI: But you give them a tough time the same
way that you are giving me a tough
time. Had you had an Israeli journalist with you,
you have been pampering him or showering
him with praise, very easy softballs. But only the
problem with that you get Arabs only to grill
them. And this is the problem.
ZAHN: No, sir, that is not true.
AL-MIRAZI: There is no way...
ZAHN: I had the former prime minister...
AL-MIRAZI: Well, you did that with Hanan Ashawari
ZAHN: ... of Israel on yesterday...
AL-MIRAZI: You did that with Hanan Ashawari.
ZAHN: We also had Mr. Barak on...
AL-MIRAZI: Yes, and...
ZAHN: ... and we asked him the question, why is it
Shimon Peres walked out of this meeting
when the vote was taken to possibly try to in some
way topple the government of Yasser
Arafat?
AL-MIRAZI: Exactly...
ZAHN: Shimon Peres, we well reported the story that
there is a rift within the Israeli
government, that not all Israelis supported...
AL-MIRAZI: OK. You are defending Sharon.
ZAHN: That is absolutely not true.
AL-MIRAZI: You were defending Sharon...
ZAHN: There are...
AL-MIRAZI: You were criticizing the liberal, Paula.
ZAHN: There are people, as you well know, within the
Israeli government that do not support
these retaliatory strikes. I think our coverage is
fair and balanced.
AL-MIRAZI: Wait...
ZAHN: A final thought, sir, this morning on what the
goal of Al Jazeera's coverage is.
AL-MIRAZI: The goal is the motto of Al Jazeera, to
cover both sides of the story, the view and
the other point of view, to make sure that we would
have an Israeli journalist or an Israeli
official with us in the interview, deal with him
with respect the same way we would interview
Arabs. And we would also remind people with that
word that you called the ancient, Paula,
yourself when you interviewed Hanan Ashawari. The
word is occupation. And this is the word
that we should always remember.
Occupation is an ancient, I agree with you. That
shouldn't have been, that shouldn't have
stayed in the 21st century and it is the
responsibility of credible journalists like you and
journalists in the U.S. to remind people that the
occupation of the Palestinian land should be
ended.
ZAHN: Mr. Al-Mirzari, we're going to leave it there
this morning. But I do once again need to
remind you in our coverage with various guests we've
had representing the Israeli government
this week asked questions, as we have over the last
couple of weeks, about the settlement
issue, which is deeply important to the
Palestinians, and also the whole issue of refugees and
their potential return if a Palestinian state ends
up being created.
So we...
AL-MIRAZI: When was the last time...
ZAHN: Our coverage has been fair...
AL-MIRAZI: Paula, when was the last time...
ZAHN: I've got to leave it there because we are
hitting a business news break...
AL-MIRAZI: OK, thank you.
ZAHN: ... that is a
sponsored segment and someone's got to
pay for these conversations, Mr. Al-Mazari and Mr.
Salama Salama. Thank you for your time
this morning.
Now the Simpleton has no brief for al-Jazeera. The station's erstwhile
Kabul correspondent
Tayseer Alyoni is a shameless bin Laden stooge who larded his coverage with
pumped-up tales of American atrocities that have not stood up to extended scrutiny.
Reportedly the station is sitting on a one-on-one interview Alyoni had with bin Laden
because it shows Alyoni behaving like a craven flunky afraid the terror chief might
reach across and bitch-slap him at any moment. As for al-Mirazi, he is a sourpuss
with a permanently darkened brow. It's telling that he can't do much in his interview
other than complain about America's rah-rah war coverage (as if a self-respecting
country would do any other kind of war coverage).
All of which makes it so tragic than even against such easy opponents, Zahn is
incapable of coming across as anything but an overfed and underbred nitwit. If a team
of French Immortals conferred for a decade to produce the most appalling possible
travesty of an American, it's unlikely they could come up with a better Golem than
Paula Zahn, beaming about the War on Terrorism (WOT), mispronouncing the names of
Olympic athletes, accredited journalists and everybody in between,
and getting into stupid arguments where her defensiveness is matched only by her
incompetence. After watching a few hours of Zahn, even patriotic US citizens might
find themselves fuming about the arrogant American cowboy who has finally gotten a
taste of his own medicine.
Which is why Zahn doesn't just embarrass herself and her employers at CNN. She actually
helps turn public opinion against the United States of America and makes it more difficult
for us to wage the War on Terrorism (WOT). The total destruction of al-Qaeda will not be
the end of the struggle. America will not be truly safe until we have smoked Paula Zahn out
of her hole and brought her to justice.
|